Palestine demands end to Israeli occupation at ICJ hearing | Israel War on Gaza News

Representatives for Palestine have generally known as for an end to the occupation of Palestinian territories and the system of apartheid enforced by Israel on the Worldwide Courtroom of Justice (ICJ).

Palestinian Worldwide Minister Riyad al-Maliki and Palestine’s United Nations envoy Riyad Mansour, along with a lot of tutorial and licensed consultants, represented Palestine on the hearings that began in The Hague on Monday and may last by the use of February 26.

The case, which is separate from the genocide case by South Africa against Israel for its ongoing deadly battle on Gaza, is to search out out the licensed penalties of Israel’s decades-long occupation of Palestinian territories.

In December 2022, the UN Fundamental Assembly (UNGA) passed a resolution calling on the ICJ to current an advisory or nonbinding opinion on Israel’s 57-year occupation of Palestinian territories. It obtained 87 votes in favour, with the US being amongst 26 to vote no.

Reporting from the Hague, Al Jazeera’s Bernard Smith acknowledged there are two questions that all submissions should deal with.

“The first is what are the licensed penalties of the persevering with occupation of the Palestinian territories by Israel and stopping the Palestinians from their self-determination by prolonging the occupation, settlement establishing and annexation of the Palestinian territories,” he acknowledged.

“After which the second question is how these insurance coverage insurance policies impact the licensed standing of the occupation and what are the licensed penalties that come up for all states, not merely Israel.”

On the listening to on Monday, Mansour acknowledged Israel ought to bear the implications of actions that run counter to worldwide laws, not be rewarded for them. He described tearfully how worldwide laws has failed to protect Palestinian youngsters.

“We title on you to confirm that the Israeli presence throughout the occupied Palestinian territory is prohibited and that its occupation ought to come to an immediate, full and unconditional end,” he acknowledged.

“With out accountability, there isn’t a justice; and with out justice, there could be no peace.”

Palestine’s representatives, along with Namira Negm, elaborated intimately how Israel’s insurance coverage insurance policies and practices throughout the occupied Palestinian territories amount to apartheid.

Amnesty Worldwide moreover issued a press launch on Monday saying Israel ought to end its “brutal” occupation of Palestine “to stop fuelling apartheid and systematic human rights violations”.

Marwan Bishara, Al Jazeera’s senior political analyst, says the ICJ shouldn’t be judging whether or not or not the occupied Palestinian territories are occupied, since that’s already determined by UN Security Council resolutions, nonetheless whether or not or not Israel wishes to indicate prolonged occupation into de facto annexation.

“All of the items about this occupation appears eternal,” he acknowledged, together with that that’s demonstrated by the spreading of Israeli settlements.

Palestinian lawyer Muhammed Dahleh acknowledged the hearings are terribly very important as a result of the Palestinians have been attempting for a few years to utilize worldwide laws and worldwide diplomacy to convey consideration to their set off to no avail.

“This addition now of the advisory opinion by the Worldwide Courtroom of Justice might suggest that actually many worldwide areas on this planet might have a licensed basis to deal with the Israeli occupation and even perhaps the Israeli state and the Israeli authorities in any other case,” Dahleh instructed Al Jazeera from occupied East Jerusalem.

After the ultimate listening to is held on February 26, the judges are anticipated to take a lot of months to deliberate sooner than issuing an advisory opinion.

That’s the second time the ICJ, upon a request from the UNGA, has been requested for an advisory opinion related to the occupied Palestinian territory.

In July 2004, the World Courtroom found that Israel’s separation wall throughout the occupied West Monetary establishment violated worldwide laws and should be torn down. The wall nonetheless stands to immediately.

Israel shouldn’t be collaborating on this week’s hearings and reacted angrily to the 2022 UN request, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu calling it “despicable” and “disgraceful”.