Trump to Remain on West Virginia Ballot After Obama-Appointed Judge Dismisses Case | The Gateway Pundit

A federal lawsuit aimed towards blocking former President Donald Trump from displaying on the West Virginia electoral ballot has been dismissed.

U.S. District Resolve Irene Berger dominated in direction of Texas resident John Anthony Castro’s movement, which argued that Trump shouldn’t perform throughout the main and customary election ballots.

The lawsuit in West Virginia is probably going one of many 9 energetic federal cases, along with New Hampshire, Florida, Utah, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, launched by Texas resident John Anthony Castro, a self-proclaimed Republican presidential candidate.

He has filed challenges in 27 states regarding Mr. Trump’s eligibility on the ballot beneath the 14th Modification over time, along with a case with the Supreme Courtroom docket, the Cases reveals.

The lawsuit was initially propelled by Half 3 of the Fourteenth Modification, suggesting that anyone who has engaged in insurgent or riot is disqualified from federal office—a clause echoed on this week’s Colorado Supreme Courtroom docket decision in direction of Trump’s ballot eligibility there.

Castro claimed that Trump’s inclusion would diminish his private possibilities of electoral success.

Nonetheless, U.S. District Resolve Irene C. Berger dismissed the case, citing an absence of proof from Castro that he had knowledgeable advertising marketing campaign presence in West Virginia or that his write-in presidential advertising marketing campaign might be harmed by Trump’s inclusion on the ballot.

Berger well-known that Castro had no advertising marketing campaign locations of labor, staff, or selling in West Virginia, was not present in polling, and had minimal advertising marketing campaign funds. The select moreover highlighted that Castro’s lawsuits in plenty of states appeared further focused on litigation than securing votes.

Data and Sentinel reported:

In a memorandum opinion and order launched Thursday evening, U.S. District Resolve Irene C. Berger granted motions made by attorneys for Trump, Secretary of State Mac Warner, and the West Virginia Republican Event to dismiss a lawsuit launched in September by Texas resident and write-in presidential candidate John Anthony Castro.

Berger moreover ordered that Castro’s case be dismissed with out prejudice, which could allow Castro to most likely file the case as soon as extra all through the candidate submitting interval in West Virginia beginning Monday, Jan. 8, by Saturday, Jan. 27.

“This could be a large win for the integrity of our elections,” acknowledged Authorized skilled Fundamental Patrick Morrisey in a press launch Thursday evening. “This lawsuit was frivolous to start out with and with out profit – it had no basis in each regulation or actuality. Any eligible candidate has the appropriate to be on the ballot till legally disqualified, and we’re going to defend the authorized pointers of West Virginia and the appropriate of voters and candidates to the fullest.”

In her memorandum opinion, Berger acknowledged that Castro’s lawsuit was disingenuous, considering that there have been no indicators that Castro had actively campaigned for president in West Virginia or had any advertising marketing campaign presence throughout the state the least bit.

“The proof establishes that he has no advertising marketing campaign locations of labor, staff, or selling in West Virginia, doesn’t appear in polling, has little title recognition amongst West Virginia Republican main voters, and has terribly minimal advertising marketing campaign funds, vastly insufficient to run an exact advertising marketing campaign,” Berger wrote. “If there have been any question as as to if the allegations throughout the criticism are sufficient to beat a facial drawback, the evidentiary submissions take away any doubt that Mr. Castro’s purported ‘advertising marketing campaign’ exists as a automobile for pursuing litigation, not votes.”

The dismissal of the lawsuit in West Virginia is seen as a victory for the integrity of elections, in response to statements from Authorized skilled Fundamental Patrick Morrisey.

“This lawsuit was frivolous to start out with and with out profit — it had no basis in each regulation or actuality. Any eligible candidate has the appropriate to be on the ballot till legally disqualified, and we’re going to defend the authorized pointers of West Virginia and the appropriate of voters and candidates to the fullest,” Morrisey acknowledged per WVNews.

Castro criticized the ruling, saying, “West Virginia Federal Resolve Irene Berger declares that I’m working for President “in harmful faith” to “manufacture” standing. So if I was a corrupt POS working for President to enhance myself and firm oligarchs, they’d uncover “good faith.” Nonetheless on account of I’m working for President primarily based totally on my guidelines, they’re saying it’s in “harmful faith.” Our system is previous corrupt.””

West Virginia Federal Resolve Irene Berger declares that I’m working for President “in harmful faith” to “manufacture” standing.

So if I was a corrupt POS working for President to enhance myself and firm oligarchs, they’d uncover “good faith.”

Nonetheless on account of I’m working for President… pic.twitter.com/RiLq2JRX1T

— John Anthony Castro (@realJohnACastro) December 21, 2023